HomePolitics12 ‘malpractices’ by INEC that helped Tinubu win election—Atiku

12 ‘malpractices’ by INEC that helped Tinubu win election—Atiku

Date:

Related stories

Barau Jibrin boosts Kano Police mobility with 1,000 motorcycles

The Deputy Senate President, Barau Jibrin, has distributed 1,000...

APC wins all Ogun LG seats

The Ogun State Independent Electoral Commission (OGSIEC) has declared...

Mass defections hit NNPP in Kano as top members join APC

The New Nigeria People’s Party (NNPP) in Kano State...

Minister Ata leads move to bring Sumaila, Rurum back to APC

The Minister of State for Housing and Urban Development,...

Minister Ata vows to reclaim Kano for APC

The newly appointed Minister of State for Housing and...
spot_img

The presidential candidate of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), Atiku Abubakar, has itemized 12 alleged malpractices by the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) that helped Bola Tinubu clinch Nigeria’s presidency.

Mr. Tinubu, the president-elect and presidential candidate of the All Progressives Congress (APC), defeated Atiku in the February 25 presidential election.

The president-elect scored 8.8 million votes to beat Atiku, who came in second with seven million votes, while Peter Obi of the Labour Party secured the third position after polling 6.1 million votes.

In a petition filed at the Presidential Election Petition Court holding at the Court of Appeal in Abuja, Atiku and the PDP are jointly seeking to overturn Mr. Tinubu’s victory.

As co-petitioners, Atiku and the PDP maintained in their complaint filed on Tuesday that Mr. Tinubu’s victory “is invalid on account of corrupt practices.”

In itemise the alleged electoral malpractices, Atiku accused INEC of suppression of votes, manipulation of ballots and ballot boxes, manipulation of BVAS machines, manipulation of accreditation and collation, and manipulation of election material delivery.

He listed other infractions to include: manipulation of election material(s), reverse logistics, intimidation and harassment of voters, massive thumb-printing of ballot papers, destruction of electoral materials, hijacking of electoral materials, mutilations, cancellations, and overwritings on result sheets, as well as inflation and deflation of scores and wrong entries in result sheets.

Giving details of the malpractices, Atiku said “there was massive suppression of votes” by INEC in several states of Nigeria.

Relying on the “Report of the Statistician,” Atiku said the electoral umpire “cancelled results from 241 polling units in Sokoto State but went ahead to declare results for the presidential election, while declaring the National Assembly” poll that was simultaneously held with the presidential election “inconclusive.”

The petitioners disclosed that the cancellation of results in Sokoto State affected 301,499 registered voters in 471 polling units across Tureta, Yabo, Wamakko, Ngada, Goronye, Isa, Sabon Birni, and Tambuwal local government areas.

In Kano State, north-west Nigeria, Atiku claimed that at the conclusion of the presidential election, INEC officials “failed to properly fill in the polling unit booklets containing Form EC25B, which is the electoral materials and reverse logistics.”

He further accused electoral personnel of failing to “properly fill ballot papers and prepare accounting and verification statements.”

But the presidential election in Kano was won by the New Nigerian Peoples Party (NNPP) candidate, Rabi’u Kwankwaso, who polled over a million votes.

The petitioners alleged that similar scenarios played out in Kogi State, North-central Nigeria, where infractions occurred at polling stations in – Adavi, Ajaokuta, Ankpa, Bassa, Dekina, Ibaji, Idah, Igalamela-Odolu, Ijumu, Kabba/Bunu, Koton Karfe, Lokoja, Mopa-Muro, Ofu, Ogori/Magongo, Okehi, Okene, Olamaboro, Omala, Yagba East and Yagba West local government areas.

In their filings before the court, Atiku and the PDP explained that the failures by INEC “enabled the results of the polling units in Kogi State to be manipulated through and by the inflation of” Mr. Tinubu’s “votes” and the depletion of” Atiku’s.”

The petitioners pinpointed Adavi LGA in Kogi, where polling was allegedly disrupted by Mr. Tinubu and APC agents.

To establish the malpractice, Atiku vowed to tender video recordings of Mr. Tinubu’s agents, “who were seen destroying ballot papers in the presence of” INEC officials.

On the issue of voter suppression, Atiku accused APC agents of “cutting off access roads into Okehi LGA to stop the holding of the election… by ensuring that election materials could not be supplied” to eligible voters.

Faulting INEC’s conduct of the election in Borno State, the home state of the vice president-elect, Kashim Shettima, Atiku said the electoral umpire “wrongfully entered incorrect results” for him.

He said electoral officials deliberately by-passed the use of BVAS machines in flagrant violation of the Electoral Act and INEC’s manual and guidelines for the conduct of the general elections.

Premium Times reported that Atiku urged the court to either declare him Nigeria’s president or order a fresh election.

Premium Times

Subscribe

Latest stories

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here