HomeCelebrityNaira abuse: Bobrisky seeks to overturn 6-month jail sentence

Naira abuse: Bobrisky seeks to overturn 6-month jail sentence

Date:

Related stories

Senate approves Tinubu’s $2.2bn loan request

The Nigerian Senate has approved President Bola Tinubu's request...

Bashir El-Rufai, mother clash over presidency’s attack on Obasanjo

Bashir El-Rufai, son of former Kaduna State Governor Nasir...

Minister Ata warns Kwankwaso over comments on Kano Emirate case

The Minister of State for Housing and Urban Development,...

Top politicians storm Kano for Kwankwaso’s daughter’s wedding

Former Nigerian President Olusegun Obasanjo was among the dignitaries...

Dollar to Naira Exchange Rate: November 16, 2024

Dollar to Naira Exchange Rate news on Daily News 24 If...
spot_img

Controversial cross-dresser Idris Okuneye, popularly known as Bobrisky, on Monday filed a notice of appeal challenging the six months sentence handed to him by a Federal High Court, Lagos.

Okuneye was charged by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) on four counts bordering on naira abuse.

He pleaded guilty before Justice A.O. Awogboro of the Federal High Court, Lagos.

Awogboro, on April 12, sentenced Okuneye to six months imprisonment without an option of fine.

The judge, while sentencing the convict, said the judgment should serve as a deterrent to others fond of abusing and mutilating the naira.

Also read: Naira abuse: Court sentences Bobrisky to 6 months in prison

However, counsel for Okuneye, Mr Bimbo Kusanu, has filed a notice of appeal, praying the Court of Appeal to set aside the sentence.

Kusanu is asking the court to replace the sentence with an option of N50,000 fine on each of the counts.

The counsel stated in the notice of appeal that the trial court imposed the maximum sentence on the appellant, who had no previous criminal record of conviction.

He stated that there were options to impose a lesser sentence by the provisions of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act (ACJA).

He averred that the sentence imposed by the trial court against the appellant was punitive and contrary to the mandatory provisions of the ACJA.

The appellant stated that the trial court did not consider the positive antecedent of the appellant, who did not waste the time of the court by pleading guilty to the charge.

He stated that the appellant honoured the invitation of the respondent on the first invitation.

He said that the trial court failed to exercise its discretion judiciously and judicially in sentencing the appellant, explaining that such an act had occasioned a miscarriage of justice against his client.

NAN

Subscribe

Latest stories

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here