Agreement Overview
Controversy has erupted over a $150bn trade deal between Nigeria and the European Union, known as the ‘Samoa Agreement’.
The deal was signed last November by the EU, its 27 member states, and 79 member states of the Organisation of African, Caribbean, and Pacific States (OACPS) in Apia, Samoa.
The agreement aims to address global challenges such as climate change, ocean governance, migration, health, peace, and security.
Read Also: EXCLUSIVE: How Kano-based tech entrepreneur develops affordable local elevator
Nigeria’s Involvement
Nigeria signed the Samoa Agreement on June 28, 2024, as disclosed this week by Minister of Budget and Economic Planning, Atiku Bagudu.
The disclosure sparked significant online reactions.
Controversy
Many Nigerians opposed the agreement, believing it recognized LGBT rights, which contradicts Nigerian laws.
Former lawmaker Shehu Sani stated, “African states should not accept loans or grants with conditions against our culture and values.”
An official of the Nigerian Supreme Council for Islamic Affairs (NSCIA), Abubakar Akande, also opposed the agreement, citing moral and religious values.
The Peoples Redemption Party (PRP) called for Nigeria’s withdrawal from the agreement, labeling it a betrayal of trust and values.
On social media, a user remarked, “History will record that the LGBT Samoa agreement was signed under a Muslim-Muslim administration.”
Government Response
Bagudu’s spokesman, Bolaji Adebiyi, clarified, “The documents signed were strictly for economic development. LGBT or same-sex marriage was not mentioned.”
Presidential spokesman Bayo Onanuga and Information Minister Mohammed Idris reiterated that the agreement was in Nigeria’s best interest and did not contravene any laws.
Idris emphasized, “None of the 103 Articles and Provisions of the Agreement contravenes the 1999 Constitution or other extant laws.” Nigeria’s endorsement included a statement ensuring that any inconsistent provisions would be invalid.
A Mix-Up?
A review by the European Parliament noted that the initial draft contained LGBT provisions, which were later replaced with “gender equality” due to member state reluctance.
The final agreement promotes gender equality across all policies.
Continued Debate
Despite government assurances, the controversy highlights the tension between international agreements and domestic values. As the debate continues, the government faces the challenge of balancing economic development with cultural and religious sensitivities.
