HomeCover StoriesAlleged Misappropriation: Ganduje, wife’s trial stalled

Alleged Misappropriation: Ganduje, wife’s trial stalled

Date:

Related stories

Police arrest 2 suspected transformer cables vandals in Niger

The Police Command in Niger has arrested two suspects...

Fuel scarcity: NMDPRA warns marketers against hoarding

The Nigerian Midstream and Downstream Petroleum Regulatory Authority (NMDPRA)...

2024 WASSCE begins April 30 with over 1.8 million candidates

The West African Examinations Council (WAEC) says that 1,814,344...

Court stops Multichoice from raising DStv, GOtv subscription rates

A Federal High Court in Abuja, on Monday, stopped...

The arraignment of the All Progressive Congress(APC) National Chairman, Dr Abdullahi Ganduje, was on Wednesday stalled due to the inability of the Kano State Government to serve him with court papers.

Ganduje,alongside his wife,Hafsat Umar, Abubakar Bawuro, Umar Abdullahi Umar, Jibrilla Muhammad, Lamash properties Limited,

Safari Textiles Limited and Lasage General Enterprises Limited were to be arraigned eight counts of bribery allegations, Misappropriation and division of public funds running into billions of Niara against the defendants.

When the case was mentioned for arraignment, the Prosecution Counsel, Mr Y A Adamu, told the court that all attempts made to serve the respondents, failed.

BREAKING: Kano Court affirms Ganduje’s suspension as APC National Chairman

” My lord we were only able to serve the 6th defendant Lamash Properties Limited

”The Prosecution attempted to move an exparte motion application seeking to serve the respondents through substituted means.

Counsel to the 6th defendant, Nureini Jimoh SAN, told the court that the prosecution did not personally serve his client.

“There is no provision for exparte motion in a criminal matter , it is only valid in civil cases

”He raised an objected to the motion exparte by the Prosecution seeking to serve the respondents through substituted means.

Justice Usman Na’abba, said that the respondents should be put on notice and adjourned the matter until April 29, for hearing on motion on notice.

NAN reports that the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th, 7th and 8th respondents were absent in court.

NAN

Subscribe

- Never miss a story with notifications

- Gain full access to our premium content

- Browse free from up to 5 devices at once

Latest stories

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

X whatsapp